‘Unforeseen issues’ force up costs of new Saddleworth School in Diggle

OLDHAM cabinet chiefs have agreed to spend millions more on the long-delayed new site for Saddleworth School, in a decision made behind closed doors, writes Charlotte Green, Local Democracy Reporter.Leading Oldham councillors signed off on additional expenditure and the land transaction arrangements for the former WH Shaw Pallet Works site in Diggle.

The details of the extra capital needed were discussed in a restricted section of the meeting from which the public and press were excluded.

But the Local Democracy Reporting Service understands the costs associated with the site are in the millions, with a net shortfall of £3.6m.

Bosses say it was known ‘unforeseen issues’ may arise with the project which would need more money.

Oldham Council would not confirm the figure, and a spokesman said: “The information is commercially sensitive and we will not be making any further comment.”

The £19m plans by the Education Funding Agency to relocate the school from its current location in Uppermill to a purpose built new site have been in the pipeline for more than a decade.

In February, the proposals for a replacement school off Huddersfield Road were approved for the second time by Oldham’s planning committee.

The period for a judicial review – which would have meant judges checking the planning decisions and further delays to the development – expired in July, meaning work proper can now commence.

In a report presented to cabinet, principal regeneration officer Andrew Hall states: “As previously reported to cabinet in March 2015 it was acknowledged that the scope and cost of the approved works may fluctuate and that unforeseen issues may arise such that costs for this project could increase.

“The purpose of this report is to request additional funds and to request that the approval of updated heads of terms for the land transaction is also delegated.”

Cabinet member for education Cllr Shaid Mushtaq told the meeting the journey to get a new school had been ‘turbulent’.

“It’s about moving forward and ensuring that the children attending Saddleworth School have a school fit for purpose and that they should have in 21st century Britain,” he said

“There will be an addition 150 places at the school so it’s fantastic news for more children receiving an education.”

Deputy Leader Cllr Abdul Jabbar said there had ‘unfortunately’ been issues ‘outside our control’ leading to delays, and he hoped there would be no setbacks with the construction phase of the project.

Leader Cllr Sean Fielding added: “There is an incredible amount of frustration right across Saddleworth that they are still having to put up with that building which is not fit for a learning environment in the 21st century.

“So, whilst there is a minority of noise about the new Saddleworth School the overwhelming feeling in that community, because I’ve experienced it, is that they know that children deserve a good quality building in which to learn and this move must take place.”

One Reply to “‘Unforeseen issues’ force up costs of new Saddleworth School in Diggle”

  1. “The £19m plans by the Education Funding Authority to relocate the school from it’s current location in Uppermill to a purpose built new site have been in the pipeline for more than a decade” – This telling paragraph bears out my long-held contention that OMBC had a pre-determined disposition NOT to rebuild on the present school site. Furthermore, they did a clandestine deal with the consortium of businessmen who bought the pallet works from Shaws when it closed. The present school site, in Uppermill, never got a fair crack of the whip. We will now see the school moved out of Uppermill, the ‘capital’ of old Saddleworth and will see vital commercial life blood lost to the village. Everyone agrees on the need for new school buildings, but the way this has been done by OMBC is underhand and deceitful. We are about to witness a big loss to those who know and love Saddleworth over their lifetimes. Shame on OMBC and the consortium behind this pork-barrel deal.

Leave a Reply to David Gartside Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *